the end has come
Aidan has declared victory over year three, Shawn over year two. It is now my turn to declare victory over year one. This year has been incredibly busy, but at the same time incredibly rewarding. I spent the entire today grading in order to finish before the weekend. It sucked. Here is a recap of some of the not so sucky parts of year one:
First, John Gibbon’s ethics of belief class was very rewarding. I have gotten or will have gotten at least 5 papers out of things that I thought about in connection with that class. Plus, watching John lecture is a great experience. Mark van Roojen’s distributive justice seminar was also very rewarding–especially in class discussion. I also enjoyed Jan Dowell’s language class. I particularly enjoyed my paper topic–contextualism v. relativism in the gradable adjectives literature.
This semester I took my favorite class of all time, which was Dave Sobel’s seminar on subjectivism about welfare and reasons for action. We had some really nice discussions of some of the classic pieces in the literature. We also read all of Mark Schroeder’s new book The Slaves of the Passions. This was by far my favorite reading this year. It is very, very good. Well worth lots of energy. The paper I wrote for the class is also something I am proud of. A version of it will make up the first part of my MA thesis. I’ve put up the draft that I turned into Dave on my website. It’s called ‘Correctly Responding to Reasons and Internalism about Rationality.’ You can find it here.
My other classes were unfortunately more of a strain. Specifically, my metalogic class. There were problems throughout on many different levels. Let’s just say it was a very stressful, unpredictable mess. My other class was on the Critique of Pure Reason. Coming into the semester I thought I would like this class the least. But, in the end, I really enjoyed reading through the book. It’s a very strange book indeed. What I am most proud of–at least class-wise–is that I don’t have any incompletes. All of my class work for the first year has been completed and turned in.
I was also quite busy travelling to conferences. I ended up going to three (although, in the end, my papers were accepted to seven). I went to Los Angeles in February to present my paper ‘On Maximal Rationality’ at the UCLA/USC Graduate Conference. It was a great experience, and the California weather was amazing. A few weeks later I travelled to Pittsburgh to present (again) ‘On Maximal Rationality’ at the Pitt/CMU Graduate Conference. This was also a lot of fun. Finally, the first weekend of April I went to Austin for the UT Graduate conference. This time I presented ‘A Defense of The Factoring Account of the Having Reasons Relation.’ This was quite the event. I had a blast. I wrote up a recap of the first two here. I wrote up a recap of the UT conference here. ‘On Maximal Rationality’ was also accepted for the Society for Exact Philosophy meeting next week in Laramie, WY. Unfortunately, I had already made plans to go to AZ, and I thus have to miss it. Quite disappointing.
I also wrote a few papers on the side. I will be polishing them up a bit in the coming weeks before starting some new projects. Stay tuned for that.
I am also trying to cut some things from my ever growing reading list. There are several books in the queue for this summer. I would love to have one or two online reading groups again this summer. Stay tuned for a post about that in the next few days.

Gotten…Is there such a word in the vocab of a literate?
Where and how big is the middle?
In fact there is such a word in the vocab of a literate. Here is the Oxford English Dictionary entry for ‘gotten’.
‘Gotten’ certainly exists in the dictionary, however, there is an ongoing debate, Got vs. Gotten in the UK and why the term has dropped from everyday vernacular in that region of Europe. It doesn’t have the resonance of refinement, but it defintely works in a pinch. On a happy,relavent note, I had a wonderful weekend in Phoenix with you guys and radiated in the presence of baby Thom. Wow, have you all done an amazing job as parents?!! Congrats and I love you all…
I, for one, have no problem using the word “gotten”. In fact, I applaud it.
Anyway, congratulations on finishing year one. Having no incompletes is a nice touch. Quite a feat!
The first critique is a bit of a strange book, but it is kind of amazing. Kant is like Aristotle. The more you learn, the smarter he gets. Out of curiosity, what did you write about for Kant?
Thanks Shawn! I appreciate the kind words-especially from a seasoned philosophy grad student such as yourself.
Most of the writing for Kant was exegesis. We had about ten 1500 word essay questions we had to answer, along with a few reading reports on secondary literature. That said, I focused mainly on his philosophy of science/mathematics. I became very interested in his philosophy of geometry. I read some very good papers by Michael Friedman on the topic. I also wrote a bit about his view on how non-empirical concepts play a fundamental role in scientific theories. I’m confident that almost none of the non-exegetical things I said are of any worth. But it was fun nonetheless.
Again, gotten is similar to ain’t. Perhaps, this is not relevant? Twisting of words and minds, it would muster a solution? Perhaps, it’s the difference of the educated and the public-school educated in the grand state of America! Perhaps, I gotten it! (Jed Clampitt-Beverly Hillbillies, Episode 6, 1966). Love. always, Mom